This week I spent most of my time doing
a research project. My research project is to determine the effect of 2
different strategies on continence of patients after robotic-assisted
prostatectomy. The inspiration of this project is triggered by the reason that
after the surgery, patients are incontinence, which is the inability to empty
their bladder voluntarily. Consequently, the patients have to be inserted by
small tube in an effort to empty their bladder. After the tubes are removed,
the patients have to use pads, and what I would like to know is how fast they
can recover their continence. Until now,
there are 2 different types of tube that has been used for
Dr. Tewari’s patients, that is, superpubic tube and
foley. In this week, my college and I had to gather the data regarding the continence
of Dr. Tewari’s patients from 2006 to 2012. The data collected was the ability
of the patient to be continence. If the patiences are continence, we assigned
as 1. If not, they are assigned as 0. In addition, the number of week that the
patient recovered their bladder function was gathered for consideration.
Besides the project, I participated the meeting
called “Prostate Cancer Working Group Meeting”. The meeting was held within urology
department and every research group attended the meeting. The agenda of this
meeting was about current research conducted by physicians in urology
department. An interesting research was associated with the new
approach for diagnosing prostate cancer. The method was involved circulating
tumor DNA, which is DNA released from cancerous cells into blood stream. I
also shadowed two medical students in my lab to discuss MRI pictures of a patient with a radiologist
to determine if there is tumor inside prostate gland. The results showed that
the prostate gland has tumor that locate on the right side. It was the first
time I saw MRI picture of prostate gland and the medical students taught me how to
interpret information from MRI picture.
No comments:
Post a Comment